Free tool

Wrongly flagged by an AI detector?

Build an evidence pack from your real writing history and a calm, firm appeal letter. For students and writers.

Free · no sign-upRuns in your browser — nothing is uploaded
Use real evidence only. This kit helps you present the genuine history of how you wrote your work. Never invent or edit a version history — that is misconduct and can turn a false accusation into a real one.

Step 1 · Read your document's real writing history

Drop in your .docx file (Word) or a Google Docs file. This reads the editing metadata inside it — in your browser — to show whether it was written gradually. For the full timeline, also use the app's own version history (see below).

Drop your .docx here or tap to choose
Nothing is uploaded — it never leaves your device.
How to open the full version history (strongest evidence)
  • Google Docs: open the doc → File → Version history → See version history. A long list of small edits over time is powerful proof. Take screenshots or File → Download the history.
  • Microsoft Word / OneDrive: File → Info → Version History (or the title-bar version menu in the web app).
  • No history? That alone doesn't prove anything. Use the other evidence below.

Step 2 · Collect your genuine evidence

Tick what you actually have. These become the evidence list in your appeal.

Step 3 · Your details

Your school must usually follow its own process: notice of the accusation, the evidence against you, and a chance to respond. Detector makers themselves say a score shouldn't be the only basis for a penalty. Ask for the actual report and which passages were flagged.

Questions

Can AI detectors be wrong?

Yes. Detector makers themselves say their scores should not be the only basis for punishing a student, and researchers have shown detectors flag human writing — especially by non-native English writers.

What evidence helps most?

Real drafting history: Google Docs or Word version history, dated drafts, notes and outlines, and earlier writing of yours. Offering to talk through your work in person is also persuasive.

Should I edit my file to look more "human"?

No. Only use real evidence. Changing or inventing history is misconduct and can turn a false accusation into a real one.

ChatGPT says no. Claude says no. We say yes.

Private, uncensored AI — no email, no name, nothing stored.

Try Always Yes

More free tools